CSS NEXUS
CSS Solved Gender Studies

CSS 2026Gender StudiesQ. 3

Trace the evolution of the Feminist Movement in Pakistan from the activism of the Women's Action Forum (WAF) against the Hudood Ordinances in the 1980s to the digital activism of the 2020s. How has the locus of resistance shifted from "Legal Rights" to "Bodily Autonomy"?

By CSS Nexus ·

Original CSS 2026 Gender Studies paper

This is a model answer to the CSS 2026 Gender Studies paper (Q. 3), prepared by the CSS Nexus team for practice. Read the outline first, then see how each point is developed.

Outline

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Background: early women's activism (APWA, 1949; Family Laws Ordinance 1961)
  • 3. The 1980s: WAF and resistance to Zia's laws
  • ✓Hudood Ordinances 1979; Law of Evidence 1984
  • ✓12 February 1983 protest in Lahore
  • 4. 1990s–2000s: NGOs, legal reform and institutions
  • ✓Protection of Women Act 2006; harassment laws 2010
  • 5. 2010s–2020s: Aurat March and digital activism
  • 6. Shift from legal rights to bodily autonomy
  • 7. Critique and backlash
  • 8. Conclusion

Answer

Introduction

Pakistan's women's movement has changed its methods and its language over four decades. In the 1980s it fought discriminatory laws in the streets and courts; in the 2020s it uses social media and public marches to raise issues of harassment, consent and control over one's own body. This shift reflects both legal progress and the persistence of everyday patriarchy.

Background

Early activism was led by elite women's welfare organisations such as the All Pakistan Women's Association (APWA), founded by Begum Ra'ana Liaquat Ali Khan in 1949. It campaigned for the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance of 1961, which regulated polygamy and divorce and required registration of marriages.

The 1980s: WAF and resistance to Zia's laws

General Zia-ul-Haq's Hudood Ordinances (1979) blurred the distinction between rape and adultery (zina) and made rape victims liable to prosecution if they could not prove their case. In response, women activists founded the Women's Action Forum (WAF) in Karachi in 1981. On 12 February 1983, women protesting in Lahore against the proposed Law of Evidence — which in some matters treated two women's testimony as equal to one man's — were baton-charged and arrested; the day is now observed as National Women's Day. WAF worked through protests, legal aid, research and alliances with lawyers and human-rights groups. Its focus was legal equality and citizenship.

1990s–2000s: NGOs, legal reform and institutions

With the return of democracy, activism became institutionalised through NGOs, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan and legal-aid organisations. Major legal gains followed: the Protection of Women (Criminal Laws Amendment) Act 2006 moved rape back into the Pakistan Penal Code; the Protection against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act 2010, laws against acid crimes (2011) and "honour" killings (2016), provincial domestic-violence laws, and the Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) Act 2021. The National Commission on the Status of Women was established in 2000.

2010s–2020s: Aurat March and digital activism

The Aurat March, first held in Karachi on 8 March 2018 and later in other cities, brought a younger, urban generation into public activism. Social media — hashtags, online campaigns and the #MeToo movement — exposed harassment in the workplace, entertainment industry and universities. Activists raised issues of consent, marital rape, reproductive health, street harassment and online abuse, and slogans such as "Mera Jism, Meri Marzi" (my body, my choice) became central.

From legal rights to bodily autonomy

The movement's locus shifted because legal reform proved insufficient: laws existed but were poorly enforced, and violence often happened in private spaces — the home, the workplace and the online world. The new activism focuses on bodily autonomy, consent, safety, mobility and dignity, challenging social norms rather than only statutes. It is also more decentralised, leaderless and intersectional, including transgender persons, religious minorities and working-class women.

Critique and backlash

The newer activism has been accused of being urban and elite and of using provocative slogans that alienate conservative audiences, while digital spaces expose activists to trolling and threats. Critics within the movement warn that a focus on symbolic protest may neglect rural women's concerns — inheritance, land, education and health. Supporters reply that public debate itself is a sign of success and that bodily autonomy is inseparable from economic rights.

Conclusion

From WAF's defiance of the Hudood laws to the digital mobilisation of the 2020s, Pakistan's feminist movement has evolved from demanding legal equality to asserting control over women's bodies and lives. Both phases are linked: rights on paper have little meaning without the freedom and safety to exercise them, and the movement's future depends on bridging urban activism with the needs of rural and working-class women.

Answered this question differently?

Submit your own answer — approved answers are published with your name.

Submit your answer

Get new solved papers on WhatsApp

Follow channel